Hackers, Credit Cards, and the Media

In the past couple of weeks there has been an interesting “hacking” trend going on in Israel. It started from the publication of a few thousand credit card records (out of an alleged 400,000). Continued with the publication of “SCADA” systems with default credentials, and a handful of gov.il email addresses and passwords, and more recently with the DDoS on the public site of the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange, and ElAl Arilines.

We call these events “hacking” (quotes) on purpose. Following is a basic analysis of what has been done, some impact analysis on it, and an outlook for the continuation of such events and their escalation.

Analysis of past events

First things first – the credit card leak that started it all wasn’t real news. All the records pertain to older attacks on some poorly secured internet merchants (mostly coupon deals) which stored credit card records (illegal) in an insecure way (malpractice). The “news” about the leak was the aggregation of these records, and the publication in a media context of “Cyberwar against Israel”. What made this fairly insignificant event into newsworthy was… the news. The media attention thrown on it was unprecedented, and the number of “cyber consultants” (I’m not making this up) who provided content-less interviews gave the impression that the infosec industry in Israel is 10 times bigger than it really is.

For the person/s (0xOmar) who published the regurgitated information this was pure win – exactly what they were looking for. This would have ended with that unless two things happened:

  • Danny Ayalon – the vice-minister of foreign affairs has been quoted saying that this attack should be regarded as an act of terror
  • Several groups of script kiddies from Israel started working on a vengeance against Saudi credit card holders.

Both actions are regarded as knee-jerk responses, and there is no way to look at them in any productive means (strategic nor tactical). Nevertheless, the combination of said actions, and the continued excessive media coverage basically led the way to an escalation in the activities.

The next action, although not a real escalation yet, showed how 0xOmar turned essentially into a brand much like Anonymous, where information on alleged Israeli “SCADA” systems logins and gov.il email addresses was made public. This leak, now not directly associated with 0xOmar turned the attention of some Anonymous twitter accounts into supporting the newly tagged “#fuckIsrael” activities.

When looking at the “SCADA” leak, it is easy to see that none of the systems quoted are actually SCADA related, but mostly content management systems, some wireless routers installed at residential locations, and a car booking system. The email addresses and passwords (and hashes) are all from the STRATFOR leak which happened a couple of weeks beforehand (and even there it didn’t contain the hundreds of really interesting Israeli related information).

Nevertheless – media attention was at full force, and the attempts to “out” who 0xOmar only fueled the ego behind the alias more. Combined with the newfound attention from the Anonymous brand as well, additional groups started to join the party, and the last escalation in activities showed for the first time an actual activity against Israeli associated facilities – the DDoS on the stock exchange and ElAl’s websites. Again – the choice of targets is not coincidental: both sites are well known and are strongly associated with Israeli media around the world (financial, and the national airline). These are not strategic targets of a classic “cyberwar” but more of a “media-war”.

This latest attack, while inflicting minimal (if at all) damage to the targets, should raise a lot of hard questions for the relevant CISOs who failed to recognize the threat communities they are facing (especially in light of the media attention), and the defenses put in place to greet such communities. Additionally, mitigation tactics of such attacks has been out there for quite a while, and even a simple CDN solution would have easily coped with them.

Escalation and Triggers

The escalation has already started from the attacking side. We see more groups that were previously unassociated with 0xOmar join into the game – especially now when its has been expanded to include more media support from some anon factions. These groups widen the threat communities that are now part of the threat model which Israeli organizations have to deal with, along with their associated threat capabilities.

We expect that the attacks would continue – especially is media coverage of this will continue to be provided in prime-time. Additionally, groups that are currently in holding pattern on whether to join the action will be more keen to do so if a direct retaliation will be launched from the Israeli side. Such a retaliation could be additional attempts to “out” 0xOmar using diplomatic ties, attacks on hacker forums associated with the recent activities or anything that would be portrayed as a violation of rights in international eyes.

An escalation in the attacks would mean that additional groups, who also bring additional capabilities to the table, would be able to launch much more targeted attacks against more strategic targets. If the attacks so far focused on the media value, further attacks would escalate to (in order): financials, defense contractors, government, and finally high-value individuals.

We hope that this analysis sheds some light on the motivations and the actual impact of the recent events, and would prevent any escalation – both in the response from the local hacking groups, from the media as well as from the assorted groups that were ad-hoc strung together to form this chain of events.

IL-CERT finally picking up speed

It’s been a long time since I talked about IL-CERT. My personal story with the IL-CERT (or lack thereof) started somewhere in 2009 when I was dealing with some incidents that affected constituencies in multiple countries – Israel included (which were part of my background research for my Cyber[Crime|War] talk).

It then picked up some speed when I started meeting people with similar interests and vision here in Israel, and we started to discuss how should a CERT be built, given the current situation (a government CERT with minimal constituency and no civil coverage, and an academic CERT that only covered a small part of the universities). There were a lot of toes to step on, and we were trying to map out the dance floor before rolling out to our crazy dance. It also started my own personal research into the CERT world, and led me to meet some great people from the FIRST community.

Incidents came and went, rants were made, I let the project simmer, and almost die completely as we were entangled with bureaucracy, politics, and legal issue.

And then came Stratfor. And then the hackers that broke into a few sites and stole “400,000″ credit cards (actually less than 19,000). And then a quick chat between one of the people I trust in this industry – Aviv Raff, who joined into the CERT effort recently. We quickly decided – seeing how the local media addressed the incident, that this would be the right time to get proactive and leave the trolling and waiting-for-something-to-happen aside.

A quick and efficient site was set-up, some scraping of the data that was leaked, a secure lookup system for people to check if they are exposed to the incident, and we were up and running (even in English now). Haven’t had that much fun in some time.

Leaving the usual trolling aside (how come people are great with “you shouldn’t have done this or that”, and really suck at actually doing anything…), we had over 5000 unique visitors to the site in a matter of hours, and some great feedback from people who used the site. Thus far it still is the best and most secure way of checking if you were impacted (don’t even get me started on all the scammers that are asking for your emails to see if it’s on the list or not…).

Hopefully, this is the real start of the IL-CERT. At least I know that we finally picked up the challenge and did something about it.

Introducing SexyDefence

After a long time of no updates, I’m finally back to a “normal” schedule, but as always – there’s some new project that emerges from just being around extremely smart people and accessibility of alcohol…

So, during an exciting tweeting session at the SecurityZone green room (which is never green BTW), where all of us geeks were relaxing and instead of actually talking to each other (again – we are all in the same room), we were exchanging gestures and an occasional snicker as we “discussed” things on twitter. At one point, the question of “why on earth can’t we make defense as sexy as we managed to make offense?” (in the context of information security of course).

That started what we call “SexyDefence”.Bar Refaeli in soldier uniform

The parties to blame are: James Arlen, Stefan Friedly, Chris Nickerson, David Kennedy, Wim Remes, Dave Marcus, Chris John Riley, Georgia Weidman, and yours truly. We managed (in 30 the 30 minutes we had before we went back to “normal” con business and ran a panel on SexyDefence) to set up a space where this new initiative would be panned out. Here are the main points (just a beginning) of what we consider as the SexyDefence “manifesto” :-)

0. Rediscover your passion for the job you have instead of whining about the job you don’t have.
1. Wake the fuck up and learn how your company works (for realz – not just the techie stuff)
2. Use everything you have. whatever the “bad” guys use is fair game for u as well. research vulns on attack tools…
3. Intelligence. Gather it. On you, on your threat communities. Now use it. Intelligently.
4. You have more information at your disposal than you think (logs. Lots of them). Figure out a way to use it.
5. Remember that it’s the users (humans) that will screw you up. Make sure your “plans” include dealing with them (not just tech)

Feel free to take a look (and as always contribute – see PTES) here: http://wiki.doinginfosecright.com/index.php?title=Main_Page

Happy hacking!

p.s. – Yes, I figured that a picture of the local model Bar Refaeli in uniform would be better that the one used on James’ blog of RightSaidFred…

 

SecurityZone – to finish this year with a bang!

So, some of you have heard of SecurityZone, some are skeptical and some just jealous. Here’s the gist of it from my view:

Professional:

  • Awesome lineup. We managed (and I allow myself to say we as I might have had some help with getting some of the speakers) to get some of the coolest names in the industry with cutting edge security content. To think that this is a first time conference, I would have cut off a kidney to get a lineup like that. Yet it’s on!
  • Workshops – I’m super excited to be part of the workshops. For some reason (don’t ask me how) the notorious Chris Nickerson and yours truly will have a chance to basically go all-out on a red-team testing workshop. I cannot guarantee the sanity of participants at the end of the day, but I’ll be damned if they won’t at least enjoy it. Subtle hint – buy us drinks and more fun is guaranteed ;-) . Now take a look at the other workshops. I know… tough choice!

Venue:

  • Come on, it’s Cali, Colombia! What can go wrong in a city that calls itself the capital of Salsa. That sits in one of the more beautiful places in northern south America, and that brings the warmth and hospitality of the locals to tourism. Haven’t been there yet, and I’m already sold – just based on reading some online, working with the relentless SecurityZone organizers (huge shout-outs!), and talking to people who already visited the place.

Personal:

  • My roots actually go back to south america. My dad managed to visit Argentine just this year for the first time since he was a kid, and for me an opportunity to get a little closer to the culture was something I just couldn’t pass on…
So, bottom line – this looks like just the perfect grand finale to an awesome year of the Dirty Security World Tour 2011. Very excited to meet everyone from the crew, and especially to meet new people – locals and whoever makes the smart choice and picks this as an international security conference to attend.
Ciao!

Information Security, Homeland Security, and finding someone to pin it on

In the recent spree of cyber attacks on a plethora of US and international government and federal related establishments a lot of speculations are being thrown around as authorities are trying to find the threat community behind it.

As computer systems are reigning most of the control over our daily lives – from transportation, through financial systems, and up to government facilities that provide research, analysis and even critical infrastructure to support what we know of now as “modern life”, attackers find it easier and easier to poke at such systems as their security is left mostly as an afterthought. Most of the focus when the relevant organizations approach the forensics and remediation of such breaches is first to recover any lost data, and then to identify not the root cause of the breach, but the attacker.

As the blame game runs amok, the actual privacy and confidentiality of the core (digital) elements of our modern society are left for grabs. When groups such as LulzSec, Anonymous, and any other book-reading internet-browsing anonymous-under-several-proxies infosec-warrior find it as easy as running a few scripted tools on their target list to find easy to exploit issues, we are facing a very tough job of figuring out who to blame.

Nevertheless, blame by itself (or attribution as we like to refer to it in the more politically-correct industry circles) won’t help us in mitigating such attacks. It may be helpful for organizations to have someone to pin the “adversary” tag on – especially when dealing with defense/government/federal institutions who’s budgets can be manipulated more easily under the threat of a foreign nation. But when looking at the ability to actually come up with evidence to support such claims we often face empty hands, and a thick smokescreen of assumptions, prejudice, and incompetence.

On the other hand, when viewed from a strategic/political stance, it can be easily seen how a string of breaches in facilities that share a common ground (such as the one presented by Rafal Los of HP in his great article “DOE Network Under Siege”) can be attributed more to a nation state than to a fun-seeking internet-bored group.

This simple reality – of having intricate connections that are often only visible when looking at the bigger picture of security incidents, allows state sponsored attacks to happen without much scrutiny or the ability to thwart them on a more strategic position.

The bottom line remains the same – chasing after excuses and online enemies won’t get us to a more secure state. Investing in proper education, training, exercises, people and (lastly) technologies, will. Instead of trying to investigate breaches from an attribution standpoint, we should be investigating root causes to the deepest level (i.e. not stopping at “a 0-day vulnerability we didn’t know of”, or the bit-bucket of “It’s an APT”) that involves how we manage our electronic infrastructure and how we keep track of what’s going on in it after the initial setup is complete and the contractors/integrators pack up their people and leave.