Not trying to provide the full story here, just a few thoughts and directions as to security, privacy and civil rights. (for the backdrop – Appleâ€™s Tim Cook letter explains it best: https://www.apple.com/customer-letter/)
From a technical perspective, Apple is fully capable to alleviating a lot of the barriers the FBI is currently facing with unlocking the phone (evidence) in question. It is an iPhone 5C, which does not have the enhanced security features implemented in iPhones from version 5S and above (security enclave – see Dan Guidoâ€™s technical writeup here: http://blog.trailofbits.com/2016/02/17/apple-can-comply-with-the-fbi-court-order/).
Additionally, when dealing with more modern versions, it is also feasible for Apple to provide updates to the security enclave firmware without erasing the content of the phone.
But from a legal perspective we are facing not only a slippery slope, but a cliff as someone eloquently noted on twitter. Abiding by a legal claim based on an archaic law (All Writs actÂ – originally part of the Judiciary act of 1789) coupled with just as shaky probably cause claim, basically opens up the door for further requests that will build up on the precedent set here if Apple complies with the courtâ€™s order.
One can easily imagine how â€œnational securityâ€ (see how well that worked out in the PATRIOT ACT) will be used to trump civil rights and provide access to anyoneâ€™s private information.
We have finally reached a time where technology, which was an easy crutch for law enforcement to rely on, is no longer there to enableÂ spying (legal, or otherwise) on citizens. We are back to a time now where actual hard work needs to be done in order to act on suspicions and real investigations have to take place. Where HUMINT is back on the table, and law enforcement (and non-LE forces) have to step up their game, and again – do proper investigative work.
Security is obviously a passion for me, and supporting (and sometimes helping) it advance in order to provide everyone with privacy and comfort has been my ethics since I can remember myself dealing with it (technology, security, and privacy). So is national security and the pursuit of anything that threatens it, and I donâ€™t need to show any credentials for either.
This is an interesting case, where these two allegedly face each other. But itâ€™s a clear cut from where Iâ€™m standing. Iâ€™ve said it before, and Iâ€™ll say it again: Tim Cook and Apple drewÂ a line in the sand. A very clear line. It is a critical time now to understand which side of the line everybody stands on. Smaller companies that lack Appleâ€™s legal and market forces, which have bent over so far to similar â€œrequestsâ€ from the government can find solace in a market leader drawing such a clear line. Large companies (Iâ€™m looking at you Google!) should also make their stand very clear – to support that line. Crossing that line means taking a step further towards being one of the regimes we protect ourselves from. Dark and dangerous ones, who do not value life, who treat people based on their social, financial, racial, gender, or belief standing differently. Thatâ€™s not where or who we want to be.
Or at least Iâ€™d like to think so.
Update: Apparently Google is standing on the right side of the line:
1/5 Important post by @tim_cook. Forcing companies to enable hacking could compromise usersâ€™ privacy
— sundarpichai (@sundarpichai) February 17, 2016
Update 2 (2/20/16): Seems like the story is developing more rapidly, so figured I’d add a couple more elements here.
First – a good review from a forensic perspective on the FBI’s request puts the entire thing in even shadier legal standings if the data from the phone would be used in such a way:Â http://www.zdziarski.com/blog/?p=5645
Second – Apple today (2/20) updated that while the phone was in the FBI’s custody, it’s iCloud ID has been reset, basically eliminating one of the easier paths to recover data from the phone (http://abcnews.go.com/US/san-bernardino-shooters-apple-id-passcode-changed-government/story?id=37066070). This would have been a major oversight by the FBI, who would have failed to establish a clear “hands-off” policy on anything related to the terrorists assets – including it’s employer’s digitally controlled assets. Later in the day, and probably after getting under scrutiny for allegedly performing the iCloud account reset “on their own accord”, the San Bernardino County’s official account notified that it essentially tampered with the evidence based on the FBI’s request.
If this indeedÂ is the case, we are looking at a much more problematic practice that exceeds incompetence, and moves into malpractice.
The County was working cooperatively with the FBI when it reset the iCloud password at the FBI's request.
— CountyWire (@CountyWire) February 20, 2016
p.s. additional reading on this, from a couple of different authors who I wholeheartedly agree with:
And the EFF’s stand:Â https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/02/eff-support-apple-encryption-battle